Hi everyone I'm preeeeetty sure this is the wrong place to ask this question and it will probably lead to me being banned. But I feel I might be missing something about Ada and I want to clarify my assumptions as I could have easily missed something I'm a developer myself and as a software engineer I tried comparing both dot and Ada purely from a functionality prospective. What I came out with is that ADA is -at best -9 to 12 months behind at worst 2 years. The reason being is substrate already gives you all the building blocks you need to deploy an entire Blockchain and with that your own tokens or smart contracts. Not only that but it's already being used both in dot and kusama (at least 12 months for kusama's prospective) I can't help but feel the fact that Ada is peer reviewed is a unique selling point. But at the same time it's like one works great in theory(and until things are built on it in sure you can atleast agree it's theory) but the other already has a working product with people using it Its amazing that Ada has the market cap that it has, it shows alot about the community behind it and how much people believe in it. It's also reflective of its potential growth from where it is now But I think Guogen is a significant yet still a small step towards building an ecosystem that gives creators the same functionality dot gives you today Is that a fair assesment..?