we are unlikely to run passive incentives on our own. Ofc, if Binance or any other partner wants to run a campaign we won’t say no

The discussion is still ongoing. @herr_seppia is all for it. I feel more restrained

How can we disincentivize node runners slacking off with no incentive to remain diligent

It should be two consecutive epochs to be precise

Yes but this would happen in an epoch

Let’s say you stake 1M Dusk and you never unstake and abandon your node

Sshhhh

Yes of course

I don’t want to front run our ITN program. There are still some details to work out.

We will publish the parameters for ITN quite soon and it win’t take too long to move to the new program once the pre-staking is phased out

For now we are using plonk+poseidon. The reason is that plonkup is much much faster for lookup gates but somewhat slower for other operations. So before migrating we need to benchmark properly. Also, I wouldn’t really like to allocate time in optimizations as we are fully focused to push the rest of the stack out

some, not much. The best example was the Tailofbits exploit, which was not exactly too problematic, but a nice thing to fix. Mainly the other forks are for experimenting with different configurations and swapping parts of the algorithm to solve a problem specific to this or that project

everything but the commitment scheme?

https://github.com/dusk-network/plonk/network/members